Filed under: Uncategorized
Tax petroleum to build a Biofuel infrastructure before it is too late!
There are many making a big stink about greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from Biofuels. The results of various studies indicate that the best biofuels may only emit some percentage(around 80%) of GHG s as compared with petroleum based fuels. The issue is that growing fuel is in no way comparable to mining that fuel (petroleum) out of the ground. Petroleum was formed by organisms that grew in ancient times, and burning the petroleum releases the carbon they absorbed back in ancient times and redistributes it into today’s atmosphere. The difference is that biofuels remove CO2 and other compounds from today’s environment, while they are growing, and it is irrelevant to consider what percentage of compounds are re-released into the atmosphere upon combustion. Burning or combusting any carbon based fuel will release carbon compounds into the environment, but biofuels are reusing ‘pollutant’ compounds where petroleum is releasing stored pollutants from millions of years ago.
Petroleum requires an infrastructure to extract, process and distribute to make fuel and other products, and this infrastucture has the advantage of having been built up for over 100 years. Biofuels also require an infrastructure to produce, process and distribute these materials (like algae) to make fuel and other compounds in a manner that is very similar to the processes used to process petroleum. While petroleum can be used to make many of the compounds we require in modern life, from asphalt to gasoline, the side effects of that production also creates many unintended consequences such as oil spills and ground water contamination. Additionally, extraction processes such as tertiary extraction(using solvents) and hydraulic cracking are used to remove petroleum from underground by injecting compounds (generally pollutants) into the ground in order to loosen them up for removal. However, increasingly there are more and more homeowners that have the ability to light their own tap water on fire, and what does that indicate about safety of the water they must drink? It is ironic that smoking comes with warning labels, but hydraulic cracking does not, yet!
The potential of Biofuels is also being denigrated by the food versus fuel debate, and more recently has been criticized as a ‘drinking versus driving’ debate. Biofuel feedstocks are being attributed to causing ground water contamination, specifically because of nitrate fertilizers used to promote growth; though this problem did not caused as much uproar where food agriculture is concerned. However, water contamination from fertilizers, weather from agriculture or biofuel production is a management issue, not a process issue; though asking our bean counting leaders to manage something properly may be too unrealistic.
Discounting the nattering of professional politicians who are desperate to keep their jobs, biofuels must be developed to ensure the future survival of humanity(how can we survive when all of our drinking water becomes flammable?). We must demand that this process be developed fully, and on an emergency basis much like the Manhattan project. Left on their own politicians will ‘debate’ this issue until it is too late, and our society is past the point of no return (you can’t start producing biofuel once the petroleum has run out, nor avert a financial crisis by listening to those stealing the money).
Companies like Genesis Biofuels, Origin Oil, and Gevo (among others) are generating biofuels by treating wastes such as the emissions from Power Plants, Cement Plants and even Pine Beetle infestations. These type projects are critical for many reasons, including reusing the CO2 generated by power generation, and using it to generate more fuel rather than simply allowing it to become a pollutant. Cogeneration has become a standard industrial practice today, and it began through a concerted effort to reduce waste; both economically and environmentally. The ‘waste’ now has become not reusing the CO2 generated, and it is much like throwing the ‘baby out with the bathwater’.
For now the only real issue is generating the money that this new infrastructure will require; money that is an investment in the future and not some ‘pork barrel’ spending program that will never realize any returns. Generating fuel produces a necessary commodity, and can be produced locally to provide not only small scale economic benefits, but also benefits for the entire planet, as well as the future of the human race. There is only one logical source for funding and development of the infrastructure for biofuel, and that is utilizing the current energy infrastructure created by the oil industry. Gasoline taxes are never popular (nor are any other taxes), but this extremely large industry is one of the few remaing sectors that has the ability to generate money. Gas taxes dedicated to biofuel production are an investment in the future, and our leaders need to stop being subservient to the financial industry and their clever ideas on ‘derivatives’ and other forms of generating money without producing anything (like moving their manufacturing to China in order to make more money).
We need to start demanding action from our leaders, if not, they will continue to have arguments full of sound and fury that signify nothing. A tax on fuel can be easily added to existing fuel taxes, and could be designed to avoid increasing shipping costs by not raising the tax on diesel fuel. Those of us who can afford to drive everywhere can also afford to pay a little more for that luxury, and we would know that we are helping to pave the way to the future.
Filed under: Biocentury
Producing fuel with biology, a renewable alternative to petroleum.
The Energy crises has been going on for decades, and the spilling of massive amounts of petroleum has been happening for over a hundred years. Our addiction to petroleum is like Heroin addiction, it makes us to forget the problems it causes while we are using; from the pollution we create using it, to the pollution we create extracting, refining, and transporting it all over the world. The advertising of automobile fuel efficiency standards is a good measure of the price of oil; efficiency is ignored when oil is cheap, and only given lip service in car commercials when the price goes up. If we wait too long to develop an alternative, the human race is done, and we may be done anyway because of all the pollution we have already created.
The good news is that a lot of progress has been made to develop biologically based fuels and chemicals. The production of Ethanol, Butanol, and other alcohols through fermentation has been around since early in the last century, but besides moonshine, these processes were never developed adequately because petroleum was much cheaper. However, we might finally be realizing that it is better to provide jobs making fuel ourselves, than it is extracting this ‘premade’ material from the ground. We have the ability to ‘grow’ the fuel and the other chemicals we need, or we can keep digging this hazardous substance out of the ground like grave-robbers dining on bones of the dead.
There are many groups working on utilizing bio-technology to produce a wide range of products, from genetically engineered crops, to motor fuels, specialty chemicals, and pharmaceutical products. Biotechnology has been developed by medical companies, hazardous waste cleanup companies, and agriculture companies in order to produce valuable, and therefore profitable, products. And we can now provide a method to clean up our pollution as well as generate useful products from it, like liquid fuels. For instance, we must clear canals and waterways of seaweed and algae to keep them clear for boats and barges, but we can now turn this material into motor fuel; almost two for the price of one.
These developments are giving us the ability grow practically anything, and NASA is working on using bio-technology to allow people to live sustainably in space through a symbiosis with other organisms, like using human waste to help grow food, which in turn generates oxygen and consumes carbon dioxide. The advancements produced by this research can lead to a symbiosis between ourselves and our planet, which will allow us to sustainably produce the products we require, while at the same time preserving the integrity of the only home we are ever likely to have.
Biotechnology gives us the opportunity to usher in a new age of human existence; one where we can create a world that is like a giant greenhouse, or national park, that we manage not only for our own profit, but for the long term viability of our environment. This is what I have always believed ‘dominion’ means, it is like being a parent, not a slave owner.
Unfortunately, Biotechnology can also be used for evil purposes. Round-up ready crops are genetically modified to allow them to tolerate more herbicides, and this not only kills non-modified crops, but allow us humans to be poisoned to an even greater degree. Monsanto has also used this patent process to monopolize the seed market, and they have their own army of inspectors to ensure no one uses ‘their’ seeds; even when those patented genes are present through contamination from neighboring fields. Farmers must buy their seeds from Monsanto, or else! (see movie: Food Inc.)
Until this point, we have relied on the resources our planet provides through millions, if not billions, of years of accumulation. For example, the Ogallala aquifer is the main source of ‘geologic water’ that farms in the center of the United States rely upon, but when this resource is depleted, farming in the ‘bread basket’ is over(see movie: Blue Gold:water wars) . Many areas resort to pipes to bring water in from other locations, but it is unlikely such a vast supply of water can be found or utilized to replace this resource.
We have become reliant on our ability to extract resources, and this has lead the concepts of sustainable or renewable, versus non-renewable or unsustainable. For instance, Petroleum is a non-renewable resource because it has taken millions, if not billions, of years to accumulate. This resource will ‘run out’ eventually, because at some point it will take more energy to extract the oil from the ground than the oil gives us in return; not because there is no more petroleum to be had. Already we see signs of this happening as deep ocean drilling has a much higher energy cost than drilling on dry land in Texas or Saudi Arabia. These costs have never included the environmental damage from our oil use, or the constant spilling of crude oil everywhere because companies like ExxonMobile and BP are too cheap to prepare for unforeseen events (at least unforeseen by their own corporate executives and ‘bean counters’). The costs of oil use are socialized while the profits are privatized.
Floods, droughts, volcanoes, earthquakes, solar flares, wars, revolutions, and political upheavals all disrupt our ability to efficiently utilize resources, and this disruption often leads to starvation, diseases, and squaller. What is worse than this disruption, is the destruction of renewable resources due to nonrenewable activities such as Chernobyl, Times Beach, Mo., or the Aral Sea. The main threat to the existence of the human race is our dependence on our ability to ‘safely’ extract resources, and not our ability to create them in the first place. ‘Be prepared’ is a motto for scouts and hazardous materials managers, but obviously not for the ‘extraction industries’.
Researchers have been able to isolated organisms that produce compounds similar to those found in crude oil, and this is helping to give us the ability to ‘grow’ these chemicals sustainably. Further, newly developed chemical methods are allowing us to process harvested material, like algae and cellulose, to create high value products through ‘bioforming’, or the catalytic transformation of biomass into useful products. Also, processes like Fermentation can be used to transform existing biomass into more useful products like butanol.
For many years these processes have been used to produce nuetraceutics, pharmaceuticals, and other biobased chemicals, but now genetic engineering has been able to transfer useful traits from one organism to another. For example, some organisms can ferment cellulose into ethanol and butanol, while others are easily grown, and by combining these traits, we get easily grown organisms that produce the chemicals we want. For example, a pulp mill in Taylor county Florida uses genetically engineered E coli to transform wood waste into ‘cellulostic ethanol’.
Selective Breeding and genetic engineering are being used to develop many different ‘biochemicals’. Organisms can be used to produce compounds such as bio-acrylic for use in paints, adhesives, diapers and detergents [BFD: 2-18-10], and polyethylene,and ammonia can be produced biologically to replace fossil fuel based products [BFD 3-2-10]. Also, fermentation derived polyacetic acids(PLA) can replace petroleum based plastics[CEN 2-15-10], and cellulose can be biologically converted into lactic acid, and furfural [CEN7-6-9], as well as producing succinic acid from biomass for the aviation de-icing industry [BFD3-26-10]. Further, researchers have found a way to convert apple and orange sugars into 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF), a fuel with a 40 percent higher energy density than ethanol, and Biodiesel can be produced by using a biphasic acid/solvent reactor to convert sugars or cellulose into 5-(chlormethyl) fufural (CMF) (2-33-10CEN). ( CEN = Chemical and Engineering news, and BFD = Biofuels Digest).
We can utilize organisms to directly manufacture products like olive oil, or we can use the transformative nature of organisms to convert naturally grown products into resources like ethanol. Further, we can use the unique growth characteristics of various organisms to our advantage. For instance, lichen grow on rock, and we can utilize lichen as a means to produce useful products without interfering with land needed for agriculture. Phytoremediation is used to remove pollutants from impacted soils, like metals from mine waste, and these organisms can then be turned into fuels while cleaning up areas that can’t be used for other purposes.
NASA is working on methods to produce fuels and other useful products in space while treating the wastes produced by humans, and this could allow people to live sustainably off of the Earth. We have the potential to live in space without support from the Earth, therefore, we should be able to make the Earth itself sustainable for our own lives. Like the bumper sticker says: ‘save the humans’
All of this depends on our ability to force our leaders to think about human survival rather than their own bank accounts. While bankers and other ‘bean counters’ may believe that ‘derivatives’ are a ‘real’ thing, some people also think that ‘pet rocks’ are a real thing. The question is, what does it produce? Short term gain has always comes at the expense of long term viability; consider the national debt which is based on the concept of buy now, pay later (and pay with interest). However I have seen in my work with hazardous materials that the longer you wait to deal with a problem, like a leaking underground storage tank, the more expensive that problem is to deal with.
Before this latest oil spill, our leaders told us that off-shore oil drilling was going to end our dependence on foreign oil; as if these companies would not have been drilling there in the seventies if there was that much oil to begin with. Technology has improved, and has has allowed oil extraction in previously inaccessible areas, however, how many oil fields can there possibly be remaining on the planet that have we have not already exploited? Some estimates are that the total amount of oil in the Alaskan arctic would allow us to drive around for a week based on our current usage.
Politicians, particularly republicans, thought that giving private companies the OK to ‘drill early, and drill often’ was going to be the answer to our energy problems. But will Sarah Pallin help clean up the spilled oil, or help the people around the Gulf recover from a disaster that she and her party encouraged? This is a disaster we environmentalists warned them would happen, but as usual they laughed at us, with people like Bill O’Reilly calling us stupid tree huggers. These people are trying to prevent us from interfering with the rights of corporate executives to extract profit from our nation, and isn’t that what Benedict Arnold did? ‘Don’t Tread on Me’ is a concept that needs to be reborn, otherwise us ‘regular guys’ must ‘eat cake’ with a ‘trickling down’ of crude oil for the icing- Bon a petite.
Filed under: Chemical Basics
DOT hazard classes
The department of transportation has developed a very good system for safely handling almost any chemical. The developers have intelligently heeded the KISS concept: Keep It Simple Stupid. Although, as Murphy says, it is impossible to make things fool proof, because fools are so clever.
To help people handle chemicals safely, they have been divided into nine categories. Four of these categories are discussed later: Explosives, Compressed Gas, Radioactive, and ‘Other’. The remaining classes are based on chemical properties that help us handle these chemicals safely.
1. Class 3, Flammable liquids. These types of chemicals have two important issues. The first is that they cause/fuel fires, and the second is that they are volatile (like perfume). The vapors from these chemicals can not only feed a fire, but they are often poisonous to breathe, or, they can displace all the oxygen in the air, leaving none to breathe.
Another issue for firefighters is that putting water on a gasoline fire only spreads the gasoline around, as well as the fire. In Cleveland, the Cuyahoga River caught fire on June 22, 1969. The river burned for thirty minutes, not the water, but the oil-like substances floating on top of the water. For Firemen, spraying water on a river to put out a fire doesn’t work very well.
This is why there are different kinds of fire extinguishers, you can’t use water to put out all types of fires. You should not use water to put out a grease fire in the kitchen, use the lid of a pot, sand (if available), or baking soda, otherwise you should have “dry chemical” type fire extinguisher.
Flammable liquids are often volatile, and if the cap is left off, or there is a hole if the container, the liquid will evaporate out and can become a breathing and fire issue. Flammable liquids should be stored in a secure location that is isolated from living spaces, to ensure fumes don’t build up or get trapped inside to be breathed. These vapors are flammable, and they can become an explosion hazard, similar to how fuel-air explosives work.
2. Class 4 materials are reactive, sort of like nitroglycerine. These chemicals can react with oxygen or water, and often need special handling procedures. For example sodium metal must be kept in oil because it will react violently with water- even the water in the air.
There are also chemicals that react with water, like sodium hydrosulfite, which is a common rust remover (a reducing agent), and bleaching agent. It is important for fireman to be aware of these compounds, because you don’t want to pour water on these materials during a fire as it will only make the emergency worse.
At one time miners used to use the chemical calcium carbide to generated a flame for their head lamps. When this chemical is mixed with water it releases the gas acetylene (also used in acetylene torches), which ignites to produce light. Obviously it would be very bad for a fireman to spray water on a fire when calcium carbide is involved.
3. Class 5 materials are oxidizers, and they can release, and so provide, oxygen for a fire. The increased oxygen makes the fire burn better, these materials help “fan the flames”. The most dangerous of these provide oxygen, and fuel to a fire. Some of the worst are organic peroxides, which often come (packaged separately) with epoxy resin, they act as a “hardener”. These materials can not only be the fuel, but provide the oxygen and heat required for a fire to start. Often car paint patching, or filling resins, come with a separate little tube of ‘hardener’. These should be handled with care.
4. Class 6 materials are poisons. These chemicals generally come from deliberately created poisons like bug killer and weed killer. There are instances where a poison only kills the pest of interest, but it is incorrect to think that a compound which poisons one species is ok for another, like DDT, poison is poison. History (or hind-sight) shows us that what is safe (according to those who make it) one day, is toxic the next (after it kills people).
Inhalation Hazard Materials are included within this class, and refer to any volatile chemical which is poisonous like methylene chloride. The designation ‘IDLH’: Immediately Dangerous to life or health, is used by DOT to indicate that a compound is volatile, and dangerous. IDLH values were originally determined for 387 substances in the mid-1970’s, and IDLH values for 85 substances like benzene and methylene chloride, were determined by NIOSH to meet the OSHA definition of “potential occupational carcinogen” as given in 29 CFR 1990.103. Unfortunately, many of these substances can be purchased down at the corner store, and at most require labeling of ORM-D (“Other Regulated Materials-Domestic”) for consumer commodities.
5. Class 8 materials are corrosives- both acids and bases. These are primarily cleaners. For example, ‘Deck Cleaner’ can be either an acid, or a strong base. The definition of corrosive is based on how fast that chemical will corrode some metal. An interesting experiment is to put a nail in a glass of coke, and watch the nail corrode away over time; This is due to the phosphoric acid in the ingredients.
The mob has/had a reputation for throwing acid in people’s face to blind or torture them. The real story is that they actually used a strong base. This is because acids are easily washed away, while bases dissolve tissue to generate soap. Soaps are made by mixing a strong base with an oil, so a strong base turns your flesh into soap. This is why strong bases feel ‘slimy’ and are hard to wash off because the soap created helps hold the strong base in place to dissolve more flesh.
The most notorious of these are the solid drain cleaners, like lye, or sodium hydroxide- probably the strongest base known. The solid is ‘agroscopic’, meaning it absorbs moisture from the air, and that moisture becomes a very strong base. It also generates a lot of heat when it dissolves in water, and a hot solution is more corrosive than a cold solution. This is why people should not use the solid drain cleaners, especially with metal pipes.
The other Classes
Class 1 is Explosives, and these have obvious concerns.
Class 2 is the compressed gases, and they have the problem of explosively decompressing, plus, the gas itself has properties, leading to additional class designations like flammable, corrosive, oxidizer, reactive, and sometimes radioactive. Additionally, inert gases like helium or nitrogen can drive out, or displace, all of the oxygen in the air leading to suffocation issues- an air filter does not work if there is no ‘air’ to begin with. This is why firefighters bring along their own compressed air tanks instead of using a filter. OSHA has a separate certification called ‘Confined Space Operation’, which deals with the issue of small spaces that may have had all of the oxygen driven out. Many workers have been caught in, and suffocated in such a place.
Class 7 are Radioactive materials, and generally associated with the nuclear industry, and Medical ‘tracers’ and chemotherapy.
Class 9, or miscellaneous hazardous materials, or generally things like asbestos tiles, and CFLs(compact fluorescent Light bulbs), or fluorescent bulbs containing mercury.
The Next Section is Routes of Exposure
Filed under: Chemical Basics
Chemical Properties
All chemicals have unique properties that allow us to tell them apart. These properties include color, density, solubility (oil and water don’t mix), boiling point, melting point, conductivity, and many others.
Some properties are unique, and make it easy to identify that particular chemical, like the density of gold. Other chemicals are so similar that only very sophisticated means can be used tell them apart. It is similar to telling different people apart: black and white people are easy tell apart, but identical twins take more effort. Many similar chemicals are grouped together, like PCBs and dioxins, which are names given to similar groups of chemicals, not individual chemicals. Gasoline, for example, is a mixture of thousands of different individual chemicals, ranging from alkanes (like octane) to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), but we tend to think of gasoline as one chemical.
Properties can be measured, or ‘quantified’ (given a quantity). This gives us more specific information than ‘qualities’ like heavy, or dark. For example, gold has a quantified density; so that while lead is ‘heavy’, it is not as heavy as gold, and we can measure the difference. This originated with the need to distinguish counterfeit coins from real ones, someone came up with the concept of density.
In the end, there are only seven different ways we can measure something:
Length(m)
Mass(kg)
Time(s)
Temperature(K)
Amount of substance (mole)
Luminous intensity (candela)
Electric current(ampere).
We can then put these seven basic measurements together in an almost infinite variety of ways, and these are called derived units: Speed is length per time, acceleration is length per time squared, Concentration is moles per volume (length cubed), Density is mass per volume, and Force is mass times acceleration.
States of matter
All chemicals come in a certain ‘state’ under normal conditions; it is one of their identifying properties. Matter can be liquid, solid, gas, or plasma. For example, mercury is in a liquid state under normal conditions, while almost all the other metals are in a solid state. Pure ‘oxygen’ and ‘nitrogen’ are in a gas state, while water is in an in-between state; sometimes in all three states at once. Snow, for instance, is the solid form of water, while ‘wet snow’, or slush, is part liquid. Additionally, snow can ‘sublimate’, (solid evaporates right into a gas without becoming a liquid first), so, all three states can be present in a patch of snow at the same time.
Chemists often use ‘phase diagrams’ to determine what state a chemical will be in under certain temperatures and pressures. For example, water will boil at very low temperatures if the pressure is low enough, or, it will boil at higher temperatures if the pressure is higher; Pressure Cookers utilize this property. Phase diagrams also help engineers design materials for various applications, like which materials will make the best ‘heat shields’ for space craft.
Solutions
Most of the chemicals we use are in the form of a solution. Orange juice is a good example of a solution, it consists of water, plus a whole lot of other stuff like pulp, vitamins, and minerals. Our bodies are big bags of solution, and according to aliens on Star Trek, we are ‘ugly bags of mostly water’.
The stuff mixed in water is said to be dissolved in the water, like dissolving sugar into coffee. Water is called the universal solvent because it will dissolve anything. Further, water dissolves different amounts of different substances, and how much it dissolves often depends on what the temperature is. For example, Rock candy is made by pouring sugar into boiling water, and then letting the water cool. As the water cools, it cannot hold as much of the sugar any longer, so the sugar must come out of the solution. It does this by forming crystals, and we can evaporate off the water to leave the crystals. On the other hand, oxygen dissolves to the maximum amount when water is near freezing, less can be dissolved as the temperature is raised.
This is how stalagtites and stalagmites are formed in caves. The water seeping through the earth dissolves the most ‘soluble’ mineral parts of the bedrock, and leaves the rest. This solution can enter a cave where the minerals crystalize out of solution as the water evaporates away inside the cave.
Solubility: Oil and water don’t mix
The use of this property is a good way to identify compounds like gasoline: if we put some gasoline in a glass of water it will float on top of the water. It does not appear that the ‘oil-like’ gasoline and the water mix, they ‘separate’. Technically, water will dissolve even oil, but it does not dissolve enough to matter for Identification; a tiny amount of gasoline will dissolve into water, not enough to fuel a fire, but it will make the water taste like crap (our senses are very sensitive to compounds like gasoline), and kill fish. Similarly, compounds like ‘dry-cleaning’ solvents don’t mix with water either, however, they sink to the bottom of a glass of water instead of floating on top. Another ‘sinker’, is the heavy part of petroleum, called DNAPL, or Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid.
This is why if you step in tar at the beach, washing it off with water will not help. What is needed is a substance that allows oil and water to mix, like soap or alcohol. ‘Like dissolves Like’ is a concept chemists use, and is similar to saying oil and water don’t mix. Soap, and alcohol, are chemicals that act like a bridge; they have a water like end(hydrophilic), and an oil like end(lipophilic). The oil like end dissolves oil-like compounds(like dirt and tar), while the other end dissolves in water allowing the substance to be ‘washed out’. This is the principal behind washing clothes, with no soap you only get the clothes wet.
Reactions
There are two types of reactions chemicals can undergo. A physical reaction leaves the chemical unchanged, like evaporation. A chemical reaction leads to new chemicals, like burning meat versus cooking it.
Another way we can tell chemicals apart is by how they react with (or interact with) other chemicals: Gasoline will react with air and a spark to create fire; Acids will react with bases (but not usually other acids) releasing heat and sometimes hazardous gases; Sodium metal will react violently with water, and crystals like picric acid can explode with friction (like unscrewing a cap with some crystals in the threads (a major hazard when dealing with old bottles in a chemistry lab). The DOT ‘hazard classes’ are based on the types of reactions certain chemicals will undergo so that they may be handled more safely.
Filed under: Chemical Basics
The Science of Chemistry
Our chemical knowledge is derived from science, and science requires that something be measured; it does not rely on ‘clever thinking’. Measured results are repeatable, and they can be made by anyone, anywhere, at anytime. Galileo is a testament to the result of allowing entrenched clever thinking to deny real measurements; the church forgave Galileo for reporting his observations that the Earth was not the center of the Universe 400 years later.
There are things that we can’t measure, like the origin of life, the origin of the universe, UFO’s, and Ghosts. While these topics can provide entertainment, they can’t kill you, but chemicals can- particularly if they are not handled properly. The knowledge of how to handle chemicals properly comes after many years of direct experience. Inductive reasoning tells us that after many observations of a behavior, like flammability, we can ‘infer’ that all similar chemicals are flammable. This is how theories are built, from specific observations to general principles.
Science begins with a hypothesis, this is an ‘educated guess’ that can then be ‘tested’. A hypothesis tries to relate specific observations to general principles, and these principles are called theories. It is like picking out produce at the grocery store; we guess which ones are the best, and then we test our hypothesis by ‘feeling’ them. With time, we form theories about which items are the best to buy; no one wants to pay for a rotten apple.
Theories
A Theory is a way to connect, or relate, information based on what currently known. In effect, a theory provides a ‘Data Table’ in which all of the known information can be entered into categories based on certain characteristics. For example, Evolution provides a way to categorize animals based on similar characteristics like mammals versus reptiles. We use this process in our daily lives, when shopping for produce we avoid fruit with ‘soft spots’, these can indicate that it won’t taste right; the theory being rotten fruit tastes nasty.
When a theory is proven repeatedly, it becomes a law. There are no exceptions to a law, and until a theory has no exceptions, it can’t be a law. Recently, ‘Atomic Theory’ is becoming accepted as a law. The theory of atoms was first considered by the ancient Greeks, and today we can actually take ‘pictures’ of atoms. Even so, Atomic Theory has not ‘officially’ become a law, even after a couple of thousand years of observations. Proponents of evolution want Evolution to be considered a law, but many of their arguments still contain inconsistencies, for example, chemicals do not ‘evolve’, no matter how forceful the arguments, evolution only applies to living systems; it does not say where life came from, only what it does. There would have been a lot of time and effort saved if evolution and religion did not squabble over imagined, and unknowable issues. Students should be taught about one of the central theories of biology; not given someone’s unmeasurable opinion about where life came from, be it science or religion.
Theories must be applied to their application; gravity does not apply to business, nor does evolution apply to chemistry. Unfortunately, theories are often used as a justification for groups trying to gain advantage, like businesses using evolution’s ‘survival of the fittest’ to justify their hostile take overs of other companies. Theories are a way to organize information, not justify behavior.
Orbital theory, practical knowledge versus theoretical knowledge
There is a huge difference between doing something verses reading about it. Chemistry can be interesting because you can do things with it, unlike math which abstract. The problem with most chemistry classes is that they spend too much time on abstractions rather than real world applications, like hazardous properties. However, the overemphasis of the theoretical side can confuse people, preventing them from getting the knowledge needed to handle chemicals safely. Most people will say how they ‘never understood’, or ‘did not like’ chemistry, even though the modern world is based on chemistry, or as the add goes: “better living through chemistry”. There are parts of chemistry that we must all understand to live safely in this world, and there are parts that only chemists need to understand.
For example, most school curriculums require lessons on ‘orbital mechanics’; that is the s,p,d, and f orbitals that most students are forced to memorize. Unfortunately for students, these concepts are barley relevant to reality, and most high school chemistry teachers do not understand this concept well enough to know when not to teach it. Additionally, these concepts are derived from a form of math called ‘differential equations’; a type of math way beyond high school algebra, and even most college math classes. If professional chemists don’t know if an electron is a particle or a wave, how can anyone possibly say what its ‘orbit’ looks like? We are interpreting what the math is interpreting about the reality. For example, chemists use polynomial equations (having two solutions) for interpreting things like the multiple equilibrium of polyprotic acids (sulfuric acid, H2SO4, can release two hydrogen ions, or protons, per molecule). The ‘math’ gives two solutions, but we must understand that one of these solutions is nonsense- you can’t have a negative concentration.
Orbital mechanics is useful for chemists, but it does explain to most people why chemicals behave the way they do. The “octet rule” is a good simplification that can make some sense out of the patterns we see in chemical behavior, like the eight main columns of the periodic table, or the reason atoms connect the way they do. The shape of those orbitals do not become relevant until grad school if you are a chemist. Basic chemistry needs to give people the knowledge to deal with the chemicals that are in their lives. There are more advanced concepts to be learned in chemistry, but the world around us can serve as a good foundation as a stepping stone for more advanced topics.
Chemical properties next.
Filed under: Uncategorized
Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!


